Skip navigation


Current DateTime: 07:41:48 09 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 24355697

Current DateTime: 07:41:48 09 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 24890560
  • Winterizing Your Portfolio

      If 2009 was the winter of our discontent, will 2010 be a winter wonderland for investors? A lot depends on the recovery—or lack thereof.

  • Investor's Guide to Real Estate

      Some even say the long-awaited recovery is here. Regardless, buyers and sellers alike can profit from our guide.

  • Alternative Investing

      Stocks and bonds? Sure. But it's a big world out there for investors.

powered by digg
Opinion: Selling Organs for Cash Should be Option
By: Michelle Caruso-Cabrera, CNBC Reporter | 22 Jun 2009 | 12:05 PM ET
Text Size

When it comes to Apple [AAPL  Loading...      ()   ] and Steve Jobs, all the focus today will be on whether the company should have revealed the state of Jobs' health. That is unfortunate. This story should serve as another lesson in the evils of government intervention.

What do we know about organs that people need in order to survive? There aren’t enough of them. Want more? Pay for them. Give people a financial incentive to give up their liver when they die. Supply will sky rocket.

Are you aghast? I’m going to infuriate you even more with this one: Let living people sell a kidney.  

One argument against paying the deceased's family for organs is the fear that those relatives will be more likely to let the donor die at crucial decision making points. Well, under that logic, you’d have to outlaw all inheritances.

Another argument you will hear: If you let people sell a kidney, you are exploiting the poor as they are the only one’s who will be desperate enough to do so.

More on Steve Jobs, Apple:

Yes, the poor will be the suppliers, but I think it is paternalistic to tell them what they can or cannot do with their bodies. In addition, they could be making a very rationale choice.

Will the money they receive make their family's life far better than? It is easy when you are well off to dictate to the poor the kinds of decisions they should make about their lives. Get off your high horse.

And seriously, do you think the current system doesn’t benefit the rich and well-connected?  The minute you have rationing and government control like we do right now, the system is ripe for those who have money and friends to get moved up the list and game the system.

© 2009 CNBC.com
Tools:
Print EmailAdd This share icon
  • digg share

CNBC HIGHLIGHTS

  • Rumors abound that Oprah will leave her show to start a new network. What would this mean for daytime TV?
  • David Moore
  • CEOs try their hands at comedy and find that running a company may be an easier task.
  • Jim Cramer
  • Cramer did the research and found eight stocks that lead the pack. Read on to get his top picks.
  • Hideki Matsui
  • Did Hideki Matsui’s performance make it more likely that the Yankees will pay to have him back?
  • The Mötley Crüe drummer is looking for a new record industry paradigm, and you can participate.
  • Laptop and money
  • Software, biotech firms, even banks are watching a particular Supreme Court argument today.
ADD COMMENTS
Remaining characters


Current DateTime: 06:01:39 09 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29778428

Current DateTime: 01:04:04 09 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779196

Current DateTime: 02:12:29 09 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779199

Current DateTime: 01:04:04 09 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779198
  Data is a real-time snapshot  *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis

© 2009 CNBC, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
A Division of NBC Universal
Thomson ReutersThomson Reuters