- Back Off, Regulators!
- iPhone, App Strategy the 'New Dot Com?'
- Cisco Jumps; Rest of Market to Follow?
- Call It 'Microsoft Math'
- Intel in the Anti-Trust Crosshairs, but Why?
- Apple Apps—Now More Than 100K
- WoW Fights New Front in China
- Smart Phone Competition Heats Up. Again.
- A Tale of Two Smart Phone Makers
- Avatar Hype Soars Thanks to Tech
MOST SHARED
- 'Peak Oil' Closer Than IEA Forecasts Show: Report
- Pociask: In The Electronics War Does The Consumer Really Win?
- Jobless Rate to Hit 10.5%, Keeping Fed in Box: Poll
- AIG Moving Toward Repaying Bailout: Moody's
- News Corp. May Pull Content From Google Searches
- Health-Care Reform Does Little To Contain Costs: Analysts
- Home Prices Sank Further In Most Parts of US in 3rd Quarter
- Trader Tax Sound Off
- America Is On Sale
- If Mickey Mouse Has to Change—What Does That Say About You?
- Nov. 10: S&P Stocks Trading at New 52-Week Highs
- Passive Job Search Strategies
- Back Off, Regulators!
- America Is On Sale
- Warren Buffett and the Crisis: 'Brilliant Moves Interspersed with Some Surprising Errors'
- Schork Oil Outlook: More Strength in Crude
- Chrysler Makes Smart Call Staying Unplugged—For Now
- Your Next Move: Thriving and Managing in Limbo
- Home Prices Decline Further In Most Parts of US
- Ponzi Proceeds: Bidding on Madoff's Toys
- Housing Still Has 'a Ways to Go': Wilbur Ross Exec
- Jobless Rate to Hit 10.5%, Keeping Fed in Box: Poll
- Mortgage Modification Program Shows Improvement
- New Lows for Stocks Next Year: Equities Bear
- Trustee Seeks Billions for Madoff Investors
- AIG Moving Toward Repaying Bailout: Moody's
- 'Peak Oil' Closer Than IEA Forecasts Show: Report
RSS FEED
Tech Check
So now we know why Eric Schmidt, Google's [GOOG
Loading...
()
] CEO, suddenly pulled his plans for an ad-sharing partnership with beleaguered Yahoo [YHOO
Loading...
()
] and it comes courtesy of an interview anti-trust buster Sanford "Sandy" Litvack had with American Lawyer Daily which you can read here.
Litvack left his position at Hogan & Hartson lawfirm to consult with the government because of his expertise in anti-trust litigation. In the article, he said the US Justice Dept. was only three hours away from announcing that the federal government would be bringing an action against Google to thwart the deal.
"We were going to file the complaint at a certain time during the day," he recounts. "We told them we were going to file the complaint at that time of day. Three hours before, they told us they were abandoning the agreement."
The article is illuminating, to say the least, not so much for what the government was going to do to try to block the deal, but for what the government determined based on its exhaustive investigation into the proposal. Justice Department officials were also going to declare that Google had a monopoly in online advertising that such a pact would have extended.
So not only would Google have to endure the wrath of a federal anti-trust lawsuit regarding this deal in particular, but it would likely have to deal with anti-trust attorneys for the foreseeable future regarding any new venture it might want to pursue. At the time, Google CEO Schmidt said that Google was backing off its plans with Yahoo because its advertising partners had expressed concerns over the relationship and what a company controlling 90 percent of the search advertising market might do to rates. But it is clear that Google also had to be extremely concerned about what such an arrangement would mean for its relationship with the US government.
Specifically, Litvack says that the Google/Yahoo partnership would have violated sections 1 and 2 of the Antitrust Act. Section 1 bans agreements that unreasonably restrain trade; Section 2 prevents companies from trying to monopolize trade.
"It would have ended up also alleging that Google had a monopoly and that (a deal with Yahoo) would have furthered their monopoly," Litvack says in the article. In other words, with or without a Yahoo partnership, the government found that Google enjoys a monopoly in search advertising.
And that means even though the deal with Yahoo might be dead, it seems clear that Google is squarely in the sights of the Justice Department. It's a stunning revelation for a company that can least afford a protracted anti-trust battle with the Justice Department. Especially as Google continues to consolidate its power and control in the marketplace, and its only real competitor, such that it was, continues to whither.
Questions? Comments?









